Production design is top notch, and combined with some good special FX and sets, the money is definetaly on the screen. However, it sure doesn't satisfy like 200 million dollar entertainment. 200 million went down the drain, but not completely, as this film isn't a total disaster. EDIT: Waterworld also spawned probably the coolest live show in the world, at Universal Studio's in L.A, the Waterworld show is incredible! … ExpandĢ00 million went down the drain, but not completely, as this film isn't a total disaster. Give Waterworld a second chance people, it really isnt that bad. I have watched the film a couple of times and I was never bored.
![waterworld movie cost waterworld movie cost](https://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/43ZxTW0mMXNl.jpg)
![waterworld movie cost waterworld movie cost](https://www.looper.com/img/gallery/where-exactly-is-dryland-at-the-end-of-waterworld/l-intro-1620844779.jpg)
The story is interesting enough and at times the movie is emotional and funny, so it engages the viewer. The movie looks and sounds great with good attention to details and the sets, especially the atoll, are stunning. It tries to be a serious movie about the hardships of life on this aquatic world only to shift gears and become a childish action flick when the bad guys get their screen time. The only real problem this movie suffers from is that it lacks balance. Outside of finding dryland, there's little focus in the plot, and ultimately the parts don't quite add up to something a 200 million dollar budget should deliver. The smokers, you don't even know why they do what they do. The characters don't have any depth, they just do what they do. After a promising battle in the beginning, albeit a little silly, once they're adrift on the mariner's ship, the film drags. However, the story's off, and that's probably why the film didn't gross.
![waterworld movie cost waterworld movie cost](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VKFsmZhQWtg/mqdefault.jpg)
The movie cost a whopping 200 million, which is a massive amount by today's standard and let alone 1995''s standards. Waterworld really doesnt deserve all the hate it's getting, it's by no means a great movie because of the over exposition script, some ridiculous scenes, and illogical things happening, but aside from that it is very entertaining with some intriguing ideas, awesome set (pieces), and a ver solid post-apocalyptic movie. The script doesn't do a great job with either the spiritual or the physical trek, but the spectacular action sequences occur with enough regularity that strong writing isn't necessary to keep Waterworld afloat. The script doesn't do a great job with either the spiritual or the physical trek, but the spectacular action sequences occur with enough regularity that Waterworld is a decent futuristic action picture with some great sets, some intriguing ideas, and a few images that will stay with me. Waterworld is a decent futuristic action picture with some great sets, some intriguing ideas, and a few images that will stay with me.